E-mail us: service@prospectnews.com Or call: 212 374 2800
Bank Loans - CLOs - Convertibles - Distressed Debt - Emerging Markets
Green Finance - High Yield - Investment Grade - Liability Management
Preferreds - Private Placements - Structured Products
 
Published on 8/3/2012 in the Prospect News Investment Grade Daily.

Davis Polk retains position as top high-grade counsel to underwriters

• Sullivan & Cromwell top outside counsel to issuers year to date

By Andrea Heisinger

New York, Aug. 3 - Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP remained the top underwriter's counsel for investment-grade bonds in July, according to data compiled by Prospect News.

For issuer's counsel, use of an in-house attorney ranked first but Sullivan & Cromwell LLP placed first among all issuers when external law firms were used and Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP was first among U.S. issuers.

Davis Polk was the top legal adviser for underwriters for the investment-grade market as a whole and also was in first place if emerging markets deals are excluded and only issuers based in the United States are looked at.

Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP was second for the market as a whole while Sullivan & Cromwell took the No. 2 spot if emerging markets are excluded.

The situation is similar for advisers to issuers. A little more than 20% of deals relied on in-house expertise, while in-house advisers made up nearly 26% for U.S. issuers.

The tables cover investment-grade bond deals offered in the United States via a registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission or under Rule 144A. The identity of legal advisers was not available for all deals, particularly those from emerging markets issuers.

Underwriter's counsel, U.S. market, all issuers, year to date

Underwriter's counselAmountNo.Share
1Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP84.88311613.47%
2Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP52.928618.40%
3Sullivan & Cromwell LLP52.766518.37%
4Sidley Austin LLP39.554606.28%
5Shearman & Sterling LLP35.745475.67%
6Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP29.688334.71%
7Cravath Swaine & Moore LLP17.770202.82%
8O'Melveny & Myers LLP12.866212.04%
9Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP11.849161.88%
10Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP11.60581.84%
Total630.233807
Underwriter's counsel, U.S. market, U.S. issuers, year to date
Underwriter's counselAmountNo.Share
1Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP41.6326712.63%
2Sullivan & Cromwell LLP32.292429.79%
3Sidley Austin LLP28.611508.68%
4Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP24.573337.45%
5Shearman & Sterling LLP24.382337.40%
6Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP19.215235.83%
7Cravath Swaine & Moore LLP17.077185.18%
8Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP11.849163.59%
9Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP9.98463.03%
10Morrison & Foerster LLP5.36551.63%
Total329.683506
Issuer's counsel, U.S. market, all issuers, year to date
Issuer's counselAmountNo.Share
1In house128.10121120.33%
2Sullivan & Cromwell LLP39.888466.33%
3Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP19.957373.17%
4Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP19.686323.12%
5Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP16.968282.69%
6Shearman & Sterling LLP11.917231.89%
7Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz10.05471.60%
8Sidley Austin LLP8.494211.35%
9Latham & Watkins LLP8.466131.34%
10Cravath Swaine & Moore LLP7.510121.19%
Total630.233807
Issuer's counsel, U.S. market, U.S. issuers, year to date
Issuer's counselAmountNo.Share
1In house85.23316225.85%
2Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP16.428284.98%
3Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP16.143304.90%
4Sullivan & Cromwell LLP11.915163.61%
5Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz10.05473.05%
6Shearman & Sterling LLP8.023172.43%
7Sidley Austin LLP7.542172.29%
8McGuireWoods LLP7.40982.25%
9Latham & Watkins LLP6.290101.91%
10Kirkland & Ellis LLP6.027171.83%
Total329.683506
Prospect News Investment Grade Rankings
Criteria

• The tables include all underwritten dollar-denominated offerings sold in the United States as public or Rule 144A deals reported to Prospect News.

• Convertibles, trust preferreds and preferred stock are excluded.

• Minimum $75 million deal size.

• Deals rated investment grade by either Standard & Poor's or Moody's Investors Service are included.

• Offerings are included in the time period in which they price.

• Amounts are based on the total sales price (face amount multiplied by the offering price). The full amount is credited to the issuer's counsel or underwriter's counsel. For multiple firms, the total value is divided equally.

• Units made up of a bond and a warrant are included; other units are excluded.

• Sovereign issues are excluded.

• Each tranche is counted as a separate deal.

• Passthroughs, collateral trust and equipment trust certificates are included.

• Remarketings are excluded.


© 2015 Prospect News.
All content on this website is protected by copyright law in the U.S. and elsewhere. For the use of the person downloading only.
Redistribution and copying are prohibited by law without written permission in advance from Prospect News.
Redistribution or copying includes e-mailing, printing multiple copies or any other form of reproduction.